Structure Topology 1 parent + 3 child seats Single-level completion design with explicit placement and validation boundaries.
Cycle trigger Validation 3 of 3 seats confirmed Cycle advances only after payment confirmation, compliance checks, and eligibility conditions pass.
Core outputs Settlement Policy payout + next-cycle entry Eligible member receives cycle settlement and transitions to re-entry path per published rules.
Payout architecture Income stream engine Payout pathways are event-driven. Each stream has a trigger, a validation gate, and a settlement route. Direct referralEntry event Triggered when personally invited member funds and passes verification. Matrix completionCycle close Triggered at 3/3 valid seats under the parent position. Leadership poolRank window Triggered by rank qualification and global volume period rules. Re-entry logicNext cycle Triggered by auto-rotation policy where enabled in plan terms. Stream Primary trigger Validation gate Settlement note Direct referral Sponsored seat funded KYC + payment verification Counts only after validation Matrix completion 3/3 valid seats under parent Anti-fraud + eligibility checks Cycle-close payout event Leadership pool Qualified rank window Volume and rank rule checks Pool share by policy Re-entry path Post-settlement transition Re-entry rule confirmation Moves to next cycle seat Example: If cycle gross is $X, payout splits and company retention must be predefined in compensation and legal documents before any launch.
Eligibility controls Qualification and control gates Eligibility gates protect payout fairness and reduce abuse. Every gate should be measurable, logged, and reviewable. Gate Control objective State KYC + payment verification Prevent unverified payout events Required Cooling-period logic Reduce rapid abuse/loop withdrawals Required Duplicate/self-referral checks Protect plan integrity Critical Rank window qualification Validate leadership pool eligibility Policy-based Re-entry rule confirmation Ensure valid cycle transition Required Without explicit gating rules, plan behavior becomes inconsistent and difficult to defend in compliance, support, and dispute resolution workflows.
Operator checklist Launch readiness board Before go-live, every high-risk item should have an owner, evidence artifact, and readiness state. This prevents release with hidden governance gaps. Workstream Critical item Owner Evidence Status Compensation Payout %, re-entry rules, pool logic finalized Product + legal Signed plan spec Locked Platform engine Cycle state machine and settlement flow validated Engineering Test report + QA sign-off Tested Fraud and abuse Duplicate account and self-referral controls active Risk ops Rule config snapshot Critical Governance Legal text, disclosures, and support SOPs published Compliance Release checklist ID Approved Go / no-go criteria All critical items are in locked/tested/approved state No unresolved payout logic discrepancies Support and dispute workflow has owner assignment Post-launch monitoring (first 30 days) Daily cycle-close reconciliation checks Exception log triage and resolution SLA tracking Weekly governance review with change control notes